1
00:00:00,250 --> 00:00:04,443
When people use different words for the same idea, useful decisions can

2
00:00:04,443 --> 00:00:06,190
become surprisingly hard to find.

3
00:00:07,250 --> 00:00:10,852
Here is our community garden brief. It records three risks, and the

4
00:00:10,852 --> 00:00:13,553
decisions we have made to deal with each one.

5
00:00:15,250 --> 00:00:18,996
I add concern as an alternative to risk. Now I can swap

6
00:00:18,996 --> 00:00:22,742
between the two words, choosing the wording that fits without losing the

7
00:00:22,742 --> 00:00:23,366
other option.

8
00:00:26,250 --> 00:00:30,840
The editor connects those alternatives to one idea in the knowledge graph.

9
00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:35,047
Here is the actual synonym definition: risk and concern belong together.

10
00:00:37,250 --> 00:00:41,059
I download that graph and the finished text. Notice that I leave

11
00:00:41,059 --> 00:00:43,915
risk in the document. The word concern is absent.

12
00:00:46,250 --> 00:00:50,497
Now I search for concern using the graph I just downloaded. It

13
00:00:50,497 --> 00:00:54,744
finds all three risk passages, including the related decisions, even though the

14
00:00:54,744 --> 00:00:55,805
wording is different.

15
00:00:58,250 --> 00:01:02,632
Without synthesis, I get the original passages and their locations. Adding the

16
00:01:02,632 --> 00:01:07,014
answer flag gives me a summary from the same evidence, with source

17
00:01:07,014 --> 00:01:07,379
references.

18
00:01:10,250 --> 00:01:14,735
The summary keeps decisions distinct from completed actions. From choosing a word

19
00:01:14,735 --> 00:01:19,219
to finding a decision, the same knowledge graph keeps the meaning connected.